From: Auke Kok <sofar@lunar-linux.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NFSv3 client hangs against solaris9 server (2.4.23-25)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:53:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4061F54B.8030002@lunar-linux.org> (raw)
past rtfm, stfw, switching all my linux nodes back to nfsver=2
explicitly, here's why and how:
I have a solaris9 NFS server exporting home directories and other stuff
to about 40 linux nodes. RH's 2.4.20-SMP kernel nicely uses nfsver=3 but
the stock 2.4.23 and 2.4.25 kernels compiled from source do not work
sufficiently, err correction, they don't work usably at all.
The problem is the nfs clients think the server is unavailable all the
time, after reverting to 'soft' mounts the machines are usable, but data
corruption will appear sooner or later anyway, so that's not it.
I know the server is okay since I've tried mounting the nfs filesystems
with the following options:
nfsvers=3,udp
nfsvers=3,tcp
nfsvers=2,udp
The nodes and the server are connected over GigaBit, there is only a
single 3com gbit switch in between them. Re-mounting to nfsvers=2
immediately resolves the issue, but like I said, only compiled kernels
have the issue.
BTW my test case is a simple ./configure && make in
/home/sofar/src/ccache-2.3, which is on the nfs-mount. on nfsvers=2 it
takes 20 seconds to complete, and on v3 about 3 hours timing out all the
time (possibly forever with hard mounts).
I'm willing to debug the crap out of this since it is driving me nuts,
if anyone wants to contact me please do so! Using linux for 8 years,
getting paid as a linux sysadmin, free-time linux distro maintainer...
and I can't get nfsvers=3 to work !!!! (help!help!)
Auke Kok
reply other threads:[~2004-03-24 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4061F54B.8030002@lunar-linux.org \
--to=sofar@lunar-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox