Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3

Nick Piggin
2004-03-30T07:20:54Z

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
>
>>>Andi, could you please try the patch below - this will test whether this
>>>has to do with the rate of balancing between NUMA nodes. The patch
>>>itself is not correct (it way overbalances on NUMA), but it tests the
>>>theory.
>>
>>This works much better, but wildly varying (my tests go from 2.8xCPU
>>to ~3.8x CPU for 4 CPUs. 2,3 CPU cases are ok). A bit more consistent
>>results would be better though.
>
>
> ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a
> value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing
> purposes.)
>

(sorry, forget what I said then, I'll leave it to Ingo)