public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Nordhausen <deletethis.nordhaus@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: chown() not POSIX compliant in 2.2.* and 2.4.*
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:25:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <406D69D2.10306@informatik.hu-berlin.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1003 bytes --]

Hi,
I noted that chown will not always take away the SGID bit from 
nondirectories. Posix says the following about it (taken from [1]):

"If the path argument refers to a regular file, the set-user-ID 
(S_ISUID) and set-group-ID (S_ISGID) bits of the file mode shall be 
cleared upon successful return from chown(), unless the call is made by 
process with appropriate privileges [=root], in which case it is 
implementation defined whether those bits are altered."

As far as I can tell the 2.6.* kernel is Posix compliant as it will 
always remove both SUID and SGID. 2.2.* and 2.4.* will _only_ remove the 
SGID bit if the file is group executable. This is not Posix compliant 
and it is also a potential security whole (as in my case). So I suggest 
the attached patch against 2.4.26rc1. It will make chown always clear 
the SGID bit, just like 2.6 does.

MfG
Stefan Nordhausen


[1] http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/1997/12/10/0003.html
--
Not only does god play dice. The dice are loaded.

[-- Attachment #2: chown.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 581 bytes --]

diff -Naur linux-2.4.26rc1/fs/open.c linux-2.4.26rc1_/fs/open.c
--- linux-2.4.26rc1/fs/open.c	2004-04-02 14:46:26.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.26rc1_/fs/open.c	2004-04-02 15:01:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -587,8 +587,10 @@
 	 * 19981026	David C Niemi <niemi@tux.org>
 	 *
 	 * Removed the fsuid check (see the comment above) -- 19990830 SD.
+	 *
+	 * Always remove SGID bit to comply with POSIX.
 	 */
-	if (((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) 
+	if (((inode->i_mode & S_ISGID) == S_ISGID) 
 		&& !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
 	{
 		newattrs.ia_mode &= ~S_ISGID;

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-04-02 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=406D69D2.10306@informatik.hu-berlin.de \
    --to=deletethis.nordhaus@informatik.hu-berlin.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox