public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: markw@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.5-rc3-mm4
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 09:43:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <406DFABD.8070400@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040402115601.24912093.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> markw@osdl.org wrote:
> 
>>I reran DBT-2 to with ext2 and ext3 (in case you were still interested)
>> on my 4-way Xeon system with 60+ drives:
>> 	http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/dbt2_project_results.html
>>
>> Aside from the from the drop you're already aware of since 2.6.3, it
>> looks like DBT-2 takes another smaller hit after 2.6.5-rc3-mm2.  Here's
>> a brief summary from the link above:
> 
> 
> The profile is interesting:
> 
> 3671973 poll_idle                                63309.8793
>  77750 __copy_from_user_ll                      637.2951
>  64788 generic_unplug_device                    487.1278
>  62968 DAC960_LP_InterruptHandler               336.7273
>  53908 finish_task_switch                       361.7987
>  52947 __copy_to_user_ll                        441.2250
>  29419 dm_table_unplug_all                      439.0896
>  25947 __make_request                            17.9938
>  18564 dm_table_any_congested                   199.6129
>  13785 update_queue                             104.4318
>  13498 try_to_wake_up                            20.3590
>  12736 __wake_up                                114.7387
>  12560 kmem_cache_alloc                         163.1169
>  12221 .text.lock.sched                          40.7367
> 
> - There's a ton of idle time there.
> 
> - The CPU scheduler is hurting.  Nick and Ingo are patching up a storm to
>   fix a similar problem which Jeremy Higdon is observing at 200,000
>   IOs/sec.  This will get better.

Versus this for 2.6.3:

12825181 poll_idle                                221123.8103
219606 schedule                                 126.7201
194233 __copy_from_user_ll                      1541.5317
191707 __copy_to_user_ll                        1597.5583
149704 DAC960_LP_InterruptHandler               800.5561
120972 generic_unplug_device                    822.9388
  87891 __make_request                            60.9931
  49207 try_to_wake_up                            74.5561
  42647 do_anonymous_page                         65.5100

Which looks like it is taking a lot longer (is it the same test?)
It is difficult to tell how idle each one is due to lack of total
ticks reported, but, copy_to/from_user is 3% the amount of idle
time in 2.6.3, while being 3.5% the amount of idle time in your
profile.

So 2.6.3 could be relatively more idle than -mm.

Do we know what the 2.6.3 regression is caused by? Or is it
likely to be the CPU scheduler?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-03  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-01 10:05 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 12:02 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-04-01 15:16   ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Greg KH
2004-04-01 15:32     ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-04-01 14:12 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Norberto Bensa
2004-04-02  1:35   ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Joshua Kwan
2004-04-02  2:09     ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Norberto Bensa
2004-04-01 23:12 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-04-02 19:04 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 markw
2004-04-02 19:56   ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Andrew Morton
2004-04-02 20:46     ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 markw
2004-04-02 23:43     ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-04-03  0:10       ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Mark Wong
2004-04-03  0:12         ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 15:20           ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 markw
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-02  3:09 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Sid Boyce
2004-04-03 11:08 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Sid Boyce
2004-04-04  1:15 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Paul Blazejowski
2004-04-04 23:34 ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Trond Myklebust
2004-04-05  1:25   ` 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 Paul Blazejowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=406DFABD.8070400@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markw@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox