From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Sean Neakums <sneakums@zork.net>,
Mohamed Aslan <mkernel@linuxmail.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rewrite Kernel
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:36:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40741208.8080603@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0404070957490.10718@chaos>
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Sean Neakums wrote:
>
>
>>"Mohamed Aslan" <mkernel@linuxmail.org> writes:
>>
>>
>>>i wanna to rewrite a version of linux kernel from scratch in assembly for intel 386+ fo speed and a libc also in assembly for speed
>>>what do u think guys
>>
>>Why not just write a program to translate 'C' code into assembly?
>>
>
>
> It's called a compiler and we already have several versions, none
> optimum.
>
Compilers probably will never be optimum. One has to choose
either to live with that or start "rewriting the kernel from
scratch for intel 386+" and so forth.
We all know what is appropriate on this list, so can the
interested parties - not me - please take this thread off
this list?
(directed at nobody in particular)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 12:54 Rewrite Kernel Mohamed Aslan
2004-04-07 12:57 ` viro
2004-04-07 12:59 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-04-07 13:08 ` John Bradford
2004-04-07 13:13 ` Sean Neakums
2004-04-07 13:46 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-04-07 13:58 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-07 14:36 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-04-07 18:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-04-07 13:22 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-07 13:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-07 14:02 ` Erik Mouw
2004-04-07 14:04 ` Trent Lloyd
2004-04-07 14:27 ` Redeeman
2004-04-07 14:55 ` John Bradford
2004-04-07 15:05 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-04-07 15:17 ` John Bradford
2004-04-07 15:20 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2004-04-07 15:21 ` John Bradford
2004-04-07 17:21 ` Redeeman
2004-04-07 18:47 ` Paulo Marques
2004-04-07 18:12 ` Aaron Smith
2004-04-07 19:58 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-04-07 23:03 ` David B. Stevens
2004-04-08 10:34 ` David Weinehall
2004-04-07 14:57 ` Rob Couto
2004-04-13 14:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-04-07 16:00 ` Brian Pawlowski
2004-04-10 16:59 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-04-10 17:21 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-10 19:57 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-04-11 16:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-07 13:05 Mohamed Aslan
2004-04-07 17:27 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-04-24 13:24 Mohamed Aslan
2004-04-24 15:10 ` billy rose
2004-04-24 15:45 ` David B. Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40741208.8080603@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkernel@linuxmail.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=sneakums@zork.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).