public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Fwd: Announce RTAI 3.1-test1 (RTAI for Linux 2.6)]
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 18:26:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40772318.8090901@opersys.com> (raw)


For those who are interested:

-------- Original Message --------
From: Paolo Mantegazza <mantegazza@aero.polimi.it>
Subject: Announce RTAI 3.1-test1 (RTAI for Linux 2.6)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:56:09 -0700

Ciao,

Philippe did it, likely the first real time Linux-2.6.

So at the RTAI home site: http://www.aero.polimi.it/~rtai/, you'll find
rtai-3.1-test1 for both Linux 2.4.xx and 2.6.x.

 From the content point of view it is what you'll find in 3.0r3, with
some glitches discovered in between ironed off. There is a very
important and significant change however: the death of the RTHAL way of
working for ix86 machines. That alone sets a milestone in RTAI life.
So RTAI i386 will work just on ADEOS and nothing else.

It should be remarked once more that RTAI is 4 things now (in
alphbetical order): FUSION/RTAI/RTAILab/XENOMAI.

A particular note should be reserved to FUSION and I hope that Philippe
will find time to advertise it a bit more in the near future. With
FUSION RTAI has an almost continuous grading of real time requirements:
soft (standard Linux), firm (Linux low latency), hard-1 FUSION, hard-2
LXRT, hard-3 kernel. In my opinion it is likely that a well matured
FUSION will become a key player for many users.

BTW, do not activate the low latency option in Linux 2.6 for a while
more. It is also likely you'll have problems with SMP. After all it is
test1 only :-).

At the moment the known problems with this new RTAI are mine. In fact
I've not made  netrpc working yet. For the rest most user space examples
in showroom seems to be OK under UP, but examples involving kernel
modules do not even compile. The core RTAI testsuite works well however
in both kernel and user space.

So give a try, have fun and help to make it better.

Happy Easter.

Paolo.


                 reply	other threads:[~2004-04-09 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40772318.8090901@opersys.com \
    --to=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox