From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262476AbUDKVCO (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:02:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262488AbUDKVCO (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:02:14 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28380 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262476AbUDKVCN (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4079B246.4070107@pobox.com> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:01:58 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Starr CC: "'Len Brown'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [BUG][2.6.5 final][e100/ee100pro] NETDEV_WATCHDOG Timeout -Related to i2c interface? References: <000001c42000$dd6e78f0$0200080a@panic> In-Reply-To: <000001c42000$dd6e78f0$0200080a@panic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shawn Starr wrote: > Ok, this is strange, I put in an external 10/100 PRO S Adaptor, and im not > getting anymore eth0 timeouts, I would only get eth0 timeouts on the ONBOARD > nic if I enabled the lm80 sensor driver.. I don't know what to say, the > onboard nic would work fine without lm80 being loaded? > > Is there some sort of race condition that the onboard 10/100 PRO is doing ? If i2c is killing the network, sounds like it's diddling something on the motherboard it shouldn't... Jeff