From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mjbligh@us.ibm.com, ricklind@us.ibm.com,
akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 x86_64 sched domains patch
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:51:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407E22ED.6050802@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040414164135.75f1856f.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:14:19 +1000
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>Where is STREAM versus other kernels? You said you got
>>best performance on a custom 2.4 kernel. Do we match
>>that?
>
>
> Differences were below the measurement error, so I consider it fixed.
>
great.
>
>>How is your performance for other things? I recall you
>>may have told me about some other (smaller) issues you
>>were seeing?
>
>
> I haven't tested much yet. I can compare kernel compilations later.
>
That would be good. I don't expect you to do all the work,
but Opteron being a non traditional NUMA, and me doing most
of my testing on an old NUMAQ makes them quite important.
Even if you just got some results for a couple of random
benchmarks would be great.
> Also I'm still somewhat hoping that the IBM benchmark team will take a stab at
> it - they are much better than me at running many tests.
>
Well we've survived OSDL's STP tests as far as I know. A
couple of regressions were found and fixed there, so that
was good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-08 23:22 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 x86_64 sched domains patch Darren Hart
2004-04-08 23:42 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-11 8:57 ` shai
2004-04-11 9:57 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-04-11 15:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-14 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-14 14:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-14 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-15 5:51 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-04-14 17:24 ` Darren Hart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-14 23:20 Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407E22ED.6050802@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox