public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: sched_domains and Stream benchmark
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:44:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <408DC909.7030605@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040427023327.GB11321@colin2.muc.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
>>I noticed your binary ran with N=2000000 which is only sufficient for a
>>2 proc 1 MB cache opteron box according to the documentation on the
> 
> 
> It does not seem to make any difference. 
> 
> 
>>stream faq.  I also noticed wide variation in results (25% or so) when
>>running with 4 threads on a 4 proc opteron on linux-2.6.5-mm5.  Can you
>>provide me with the specs of the system you ran your tests on?
> 
> 
> Yes, mm5 is still broken because it has the "tuned to numasaurus" numa
> scheduler. Run it on a standard (non mm*) kernel or with Ingo's early 
> load balance patch.
> 

Now what is wrong with it? I thought you said it is OK
now that Ingo's balance-on-clone is implemented, and
that you also saw similar variation in results with
numasched?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-27  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1N7xQ-7fh-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-20 18:58 ` sched_domains and Stream benchmark Andi Kleen
2004-04-26 22:30   ` Darren Hart
2004-04-27  2:33     ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-27  2:44       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-04-27  2:48         ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-27  2:54           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-27 16:47       ` Darren Hart
2004-04-27 21:03         ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-28  9:47     ` Zoltan Menyhart
2004-04-28 17:20       ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-20 17:43 Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=408DC909.7030605@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox