Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [RFC] Revised CKRM release

Alex Lyashkov
2004-05-01T06:10:31Z

В Сбт, 01.05.2004, в 02:43, Herbert Poetzl пишет:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:17:39PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > nagar@watson.ibm.com said:
> > > Jeff, do you have any numbers for UML overhead in 2.6 ?
> >
> > It obviously depends on the workload, but for "normal" things, like kernel
> > builds and web serving, it's generally in the 20-30% range. That can be
> > reduced, since I haven't spent too much time on tuning. I'm aiming for the
> > teens, and I don't think that'll be too hard.
>
> hmm, just wanted to mention that linux-vserver has
> around 0% overhead and often allows to improve
> performance due to resource sharing ...
>
Herber please not say vserver have - 0 overhead.
it generally wrong.
But overhead less than UML is right.

> basically it's a soft partitioning concept based on
> 'Security Contexts' which allow to create many
> independant Virtual Private Servers (VPS), which
> act simultaneously on one box at full speed, sharing
> the available hardware resources.
>
> see http://linux-vserver.org for details ...
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> PS: UML and Linux-VServer play together nicely ...
>
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > ckrm-tech mailing list
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net>
PSoft