From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com,
akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:14:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40927B6C.9020600@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| Christoph Hellwig wrote:
|
|>> Did you notice that V4 blows XFS and ReiserFS V3 away in
|>> benchmarks? That is what I have been doing for 3 years....
|>>
|>> See www.namesys.com for details.
|>>
|>
|>
|> see www.microsoft.com why Windows is much better than Linux. Yeah,
|> thanks.
|>
|>
| Ask the users whether their laptops, etc., seem to go a lot faster with
| V4. They seem to be pretty happy with it.
With the speed, yes. With the stability, no. I use it on my desktop
now, as that's for games, and use xfs on cryptoloop for my laptop. I
hope to replace that with reiser4 and some crypto plugin someday. I'll
follow this up with the specific problems in a bit.
|
| V4 fixed all of V3's serious performance flaws, and totally obsoletes
| it. I am very happy with it.
|
In fact, regarding the whole "innovation" thing, Microsoft and others
have occasionally announced that they were going to create a filesystem
which could act as a database (or the other way around), and generally
introduce some of the features reiser4 has solid by now.
Every time I've seen such a thing announced, it flops later. It becomes
a userland project, or an abandoned project, and definitely nowhere near
as usable. Reiser4, however, seems to already have that kind of
functionality -- it's efficient at storing lots of tiny flat text files,
and searching them randomly.
I haven't run any benchmarks against "real" databases like mysql, but if
we want to talk about what V4 obsoletes, it obsoletes things which
haven't even been developed/released yet (WinFS on Longhorn).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=cYSQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-30 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 19:54 [PATCH] reiserfs v3 patches for 2.6.6-rc2 Chris Mason
2004-04-26 16:59 ` I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 17:31 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 18:15 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 19:12 ` Mark Hahn
2004-04-26 19:13 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 20:40 ` Matthias Andree
2004-04-26 22:20 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-26 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-27 17:35 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 18:00 ` Markus Törnqvist
2004-04-26 19:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:29 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-28 0:10 ` Stefan Traby
2004-04-27 18:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-28 5:51 ` Meelis Roos
2004-04-30 16:14 ` David Masover [this message]
2004-05-02 4:14 ` Rob Landley
2004-04-26 19:56 ` Matt H.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40927B6C.9020600@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox