From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263711AbUEGRVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 13:21:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263713AbUEGRVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 13:21:44 -0400 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:63250 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263711AbUEGRVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2004 13:21:43 -0400 Message-ID: <409BC735.2060308@techsource.com> Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 13:28:21 -0400 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Hemminger CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Distributions vs kernel development References: <20040507085312.3247d70d@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <20040507085312.3247d70d@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger wrote: > After having being burned twice: first by Mandrake and supermount, and second > by SuSe and reiserfs attributes; are any of the distributions committed to > making sure that their distribution will run the standard kernel? (ie. 2.6.X from > kernel.org). I use Gentoo for this.