From: Warren Togami <wtogami@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>,
Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] to fix i2o_proc kernel panic on access of /proc/i2o/iop0/lct
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 03:08:32 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <409E2D50.8030402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <409DA6CD.2080303@shadowconnect.com>
Markus Lidel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ingo Oeser wrote:
>
>>> the patch fixes a bug in the i2o_proc.c module, where the kernel
>>> panics, if you access /proc/i2o/iop0/lct and read more then 1024
>>> bytes of it.
>>> The problem was, that no paging was implemented by the function. This
>>> is now solved.
>>
>> What about solving this properly and using the seq_file API for this
>> problem class as anywhere else in the kernel?
>> Code will also get much more readable by this ;-)
>
>
> Didn't know of the seq_file API. But you are right, now it looks much
> cleaner than before. Thanks for telling me!
>
Thanks Markus! This patch seems to solve the x86-64 rmmod oops.
Unfortunately I have discovered another problem, a fix for that problem,
then another problem after that. I tested it by running the two scripts
below simultaneously. Not long after running the scripts it triggered
many oopses and eventually a panic.
#!/bin/bash
date
modprobe i2o_proc
modprobe -r i2o_proc
exec $0
#!/bin/bash
cat /proc/i2o/iop0/lct
exec $0
http://togami.com/~warren/temp/i2o_proc.log.bz2
bzip2 compressed log from the netconsole, showing the many oops and
tracebacks all the way to the final panic. (I suspect this problem may
exist in many other kernel modules too?)
--- kernel-2.6.5.orig/linux-2.6.5/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.c
2004-04-03 17:37:25.000000000 -1000
+++ kernel-2.6.5/linux-2.6.5/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.c
2004-05-09 01:18:05.667902973 -1000
@@ -3329,6 +3329,7 @@
i2o_proc_dir_root = proc_mkdir("i2o", 0);
if(!i2o_proc_dir_root)
return -1;
+ i2o_proc_dir_root->owner = THIS_MODULE;
for(i = 0; i < MAX_I2O_CONTROLLERS; i++)
{
Al Viro immediately saw the race condition as ->owner not being set.
Adding the above patch seems to prevent oops and panic when
simultaneously running the two scripts. This test has been done on x86-64.
Unfortunately the modprobe script stops at a certain point when it
attempts to load the module. With the other script still looping, it
appears to cause this:
[root@i2obox64 root]# lsmod
Module Size Used by
i2o_proc 53056 4294961501
And dmesg repeats this message billions of times:
de_put: entry i2o already free!
I am guessing this is some kind of locking trouble? In any case after
this ->owner fix this module is no longer problematic, mainly because
NOBODY has any good reason to be using the i2o_proc module (or load and
unload it rapidly), and it is not necessary for normal i2o_block usage.
Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-09 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-08 11:33 [PATCH 2.6] to fix i2o_proc kernel panic on access of /proc/i2o/iop0/lct Markus Lidel
2004-05-08 15:39 ` Ingo Oeser
2004-05-09 3:34 ` Markus Lidel
2004-05-09 13:08 ` Warren Togami [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=409E2D50.8030402@redhat.com \
--to=wtogami@redhat.com \
--cc=Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=gafton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox