From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264404AbUEMTBW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 15:01:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264406AbUEMTBW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 15:01:22 -0400 Received: from ultra12.almamedia.fi ([193.209.83.38]:4524 "EHLO ultra12.almamedia.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264404AbUEMTBV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 15:01:21 -0400 Message-ID: <40A3C639.4FD98046@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 22:02:17 +0300 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton Cc: michal@logix.cz, jmorris@redhat.com, davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Support for VIA PadLock crypto engine References: <40A37118.ED58E781@users.sourceforge.net> <20040513113028.085194a3.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Jari Ruusu wrote: > > The cryptoloop implementation is busted in more than one way, so it is > > useless for security needs: > > Is dm-crypt any better? Nope. dm-crypt has same exploitable cryptographic flaws. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD