From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
olaf+list.linux-kernel@olafdietsche.de, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support cap inheritable (Re: [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 (was Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:34:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AAB9AA.8090508@myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040517235844.I21045@build.pdx.osdl.net>
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Chris Wright (chrisw@osdl.org) wrote:
>
>>* Andy Lutomirski (luto@myrealbox.com) wrote:
>>
>>>This version throws out the inheritable mask. There is no change in
>>>behavior with newcaps=0.
>>
>>Alright, I tried to write up my expectations for all the various modes
>>w.r.t dropping privs, keeping them, setuid apps, etc. I then wrote some
>>tests to get a baseline, and well as a way to compare results. Finally
>>I wrote a patch that meets the requirements I laid out, and compared it
>>against yours. With one minor exception, the capabilities bits match
>>up. You drop effective caps when a non-root users execs a non-root
>>setuid app, and I the caps alone. One side note, you're changes effect
>>the user/group saved ids unexpectedly.
Disclaimer: I haven't had a chance to boot this version.
>
>
> The tests are available at:
> http://developer.osdl.org/~chrisw/capabilities/testcap.tar.bz2
>
> patch is there too and is also inline below:
> http://developer.osdl.org/~chrisw/capabilities/2.6.6-mm2/chris_cap.patch
>
> --- linux-2.6.6-mm2-cap/include/linux/capability.h.orig 2004-05-09 19:32:26.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.6-mm2-cap/include/linux/capability.h 2004-05-17 23:24:08.143860096 -0700
> @@ -309,7 +309,9 @@
> #define CAP_EMPTY_SET to_cap_t(0)
> #define CAP_FULL_SET to_cap_t(~0)
> #define CAP_INIT_EFF_SET to_cap_t(~0 & ~CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETPCAP))
> -#define CAP_INIT_INH_SET to_cap_t(0)
> +#define CAP_INIT_INH_SET to_cap_t(~0)
> +/* ~0 is legacy inheritable mode and can never be capset by user */
> +#define cap_orig_inh(_cap) (cap_t((_cap)) == ~0)
So how do you say "inherit all caps"?
[...]
> @@ -56,10 +59,13 @@
> int cap_capset_check (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective,
> kernel_cap_t *inheritable, kernel_cap_t *permitted)
> {
> + kernel_cap_t target_inheritable = target->cap_inheritable;
> + if (cap_orig_inh(target_inheritable))
> + target_inheritable = 0;
> /* Derived from kernel/capability.c:sys_capset. */
> /* verify restrictions on target's new Inheritable set */
> if (!cap_issubset (*inheritable,
> - cap_combine (target->cap_inheritable,
> + cap_combine (target_inheritable,
> current->cap_permitted))) {
> return -EPERM;
> }
What stops legacy mode from being reenabled?
[...]
I think you missed the case when root-but-no-caps execs setuid root -- I
don't see anything that would enable secureexec.
--Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-19 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.dt4cg55.jnqvr5@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.mu5rj3d.24gtbp@ifi.uio.no>
2004-05-14 15:57 ` [PATCH] capabilites, take 2 Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 16:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 16:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 16:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 18:07 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 (was Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2) Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-15 0:06 ` [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 Olaf Dietsche
2004-05-14 22:09 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-05-15 0:27 ` Chris Wright
[not found] ` <20040517231912.H21045@build.pdx.osdl.net>
2004-05-18 9:11 ` [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 (was Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2) Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-19 1:27 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-19 1:54 ` [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-19 7:30 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-23 9:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-23 18:48 ` Olaf Dietsche
2004-05-24 23:38 ` [PATCH] caps, compromise version (was Re: [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4) Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-24 23:56 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-25 0:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <20040517235844.I21045@build.pdx.osdl.net>
2004-05-19 1:34 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2004-05-19 7:27 ` [PATCH] support cap inheritable (Re: [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4 (was Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2) Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40AAB9AA.8090508@myrealbox.com \
--to=luto@myrealbox.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf+list.linux-kernel@olafdietsche.de \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox