From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263711AbUESLWr (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 07:22:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263624AbUESLVU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 07:21:20 -0400 Received: from ns.clanhk.org ([69.93.101.154]:4026 "EHLO mail.clanhk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263664AbUESLSo (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 07:18:44 -0400 Message-ID: <40AB42D4.5010704@clanhk.org> Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 06:19:48 -0500 From: "J. Ryan Earl" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan De Luyck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100? References: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org> In-Reply-To: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've always had good results with the e100 driver: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.3.36-k1 Copyright (c) 2003 Intel Corporation e100: selftest OK. e100: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Connection Hardware receive checksums enabled cpu cycle saver enabled Jan De Luyck wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Hello List, > >I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my 2.6 kernel configuration on my >trusty SMP HP Netserver LC3, which comes shipped with 2 identical intel Pro >Ethernet 100 mbit cards: > >0000:00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] >(rev 05) > Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NetServer 10/100TX > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 16 > Memory at fecfd000 (32-bit, prefetchable) > I/O ports at fcc0 [size=32] > Memory at fed00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] > Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1 > >I'm wondering what driver is the "best" one to use? Judging by the comments in >the files, the e100 driver seems to be the best maintained, though I'm >probably wrong ;p > >The website that is referenced in the eepro100 driver is no longer available >(returns a 404). > >If someone can shed some light on this, thanks! > >Jan >- -- >Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. > -- Mark Harrold >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFAqwWhUQQOfidJUwQRAt7wAJ9H/wapw68XfrYHgV44tf4MfqIUeACdFBvF >R4Aupx+q9AlCKEWjtAE2v2c= >=jQHj >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >