From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264247AbUESPno (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 11:43:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264256AbUESPkz (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 11:40:55 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([216.238.38.203]:12443 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264251AbUESPiX (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 11:38:23 -0400 Message-ID: <40AB8147.5080404@tmr.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 11:46:15 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan De Luyck CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100? References: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org> In-Reply-To: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan De Luyck wrote: > I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my 2.6 kernel configuration on my > trusty SMP HP Netserver LC3, which comes shipped with 2 identical intel Pro > Ethernet 100 mbit cards: While initially there did seem to be lockups with multiple e100 devices, I haven't seen that in some versions. I have several servers which run the NICs at 70-80 Mbit all the time and see no issues with the e100 at this time. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979