From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:18:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040511125405.GA14578@linux-sh.org>
Paul Mundt wrote:
> Presently 2.6.6 backs out the CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX in favor of using a
> hardcoded 8139_RXBUF_IDX (again). This seems to have been done due to
> some issues occuring with 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 3, however (as the Kconfig
> pointed out), we still need 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 1 in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> case.
>
> The patch which made this change can be seen at:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=shemminger/cset@1.1371.719.67?nav=!-|index.html|stats|!+|index.html|ChangeSet@-8w
>
> Before that, CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX was set to 1 both in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> and CONFIG_EMBEDDED cases. This patch adds that back into the current 8139too.
Patch applied to 2.6.x.
> Additionally, why remove the config option at all? Wouldn't it just be
> easier to drop the range from 0 - 3 to 0 - 2 until problems with a 64K ring
> size are resolved?
<shrug> Mainly it was easier just to hardcode it in the driver.
I would not object to your suggestion of "0 - 2", however I tend to
think that the current lack of option, with your patch applied, serves
the user best: the driver will always use the largest RX buffer
possible for the hardware.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-20 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-11 12:54 [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded Paul Mundt
2004-05-20 2:18 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox