public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:18:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040511125405.GA14578@linux-sh.org>

Paul Mundt wrote:
> Presently 2.6.6 backs out the CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX in favor of using a
> hardcoded 8139_RXBUF_IDX (again). This seems to have been done due to
> some issues occuring with 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 3, however (as the Kconfig
> pointed out), we still need 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 1 in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> case.
> 
> The patch which made this change can be seen at:
> 
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=shemminger/cset@1.1371.719.67?nav=!-|index.html|stats|!+|index.html|ChangeSet@-8w
> 
> Before that, CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX was set to 1 both in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> and CONFIG_EMBEDDED cases. This patch adds that back into the current 8139too.

Patch applied to 2.6.x.


> Additionally, why remove the config option at all? Wouldn't it just be
> easier to drop the range from 0 - 3 to 0 - 2 until problems with a 64K ring
> size are resolved?

<shrug>  Mainly it was easier just to hardcode it in the driver.

I would not object to your suggestion of "0 - 2", however I tend to 
think that the current lack of option, with your patch applied, serves 
the user best:  the driver will always use the largest RX buffer 
possible for the hardware.

	Jeff




      reply	other threads:[~2004-05-20  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-11 12:54 [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded Paul Mundt
2004-05-20  2:18 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox