Re: [RFC PATCH] explicitly mark recursion count

viro
2004-06-02T19:37:23Z

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:58:32PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> Note the "in the most general case" part. You can get things right if
> you make some assumptions and those assumptions are actually valid.
> In my case the assumptions are:
> 1. all relevant function pointers are stuffed into some struct and

Wrong. They are often passed as arguments to generic helpers, without
being ever put into any structures.