Re: [RFC PATCH] explicitly mark recursion count

Jörn Engel
2004-06-02T16:17:50Z

On Wed, 2 June 2004 08:52:53 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I think the above syntax is both human-readable and "obviously parseable"
> in many trivial ways. Whaddaya think? Works for you?

Works for me for trivial recursions (just one function involved. With
a little more pain, it should work for basically everything. Only
exception are multiple recursions around the same function. So unless
you like to keep those suckers, I'm fine with it.

Jörn

--
The cheapest, fastest and most reliable components of a computer
system are those that aren't there.
-- Gordon Bell, DEC labratories