From: Christian <evil@g-house.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org
Subject: tarballs of patchsets?
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:15:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B21F98.1080803@g-house.de> (raw)
hi,
i am trying to chase some bug and i know, it must be somewhere between 2.6.4 and
2.6.5. the 2.6.5 patch is 7.0 MB (unpacked). although i am pretty sure the lines
starting with "diff -Nru a/Documentation" do seem to be involved with the issue,
i am not a programmer and often have to use brute-force methods as described in
"BUG-HUNTING". that said, i'd like to know, if there is a possibility to find
out the different sets that generated this "patch-2.6.5.bz2".
correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't it like:
- $scsi-maintainer sent in these patches
- $ppc_maintainer sent in those patches
- fix from author_x
- more fixes from author_y
and then this whole thing is cat'ed altogether to the very patch-file.bz2?
could one compile a tar.[bz2|gz] from the patch-sets, before putting it into one
large patch-file?
hm, maybe it's done in another way.
the thing is: even when i say: "hm, this is a ppc issue, so i'll cut out all
diff's touching arch/ppc/ (i.e. from "$ppc_maintainer") -> the kernel might not
compile then, and i have to wait until compilation is almost finished, just to
find out that something under drivers/char was referencing a change in arch/ppc.
when i could know "oh, the guy who changed arch/ppc also touched drivers/char",
i would cut out _both_ and the kernel would at least compile.
perhaps the whole process of releasing a patch is way more complex than i think
here, but perhaps someone has some thoughts on it. just now compilation of
2.5.6-rc1 failed. i hoped it would at least compile, because it's "only" 4MB to
search for the bug then.
Thank you,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #9:
doppler effect
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-24 16:15 Christian [this message]
2004-05-24 16:33 ` tarballs of patchsets? Christian
2004-05-24 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-24 22:02 ` Christian
2004-05-25 16:02 ` Andy Isaacson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B21F98.1080803@g-house.de \
--to=evil@g-house.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox