From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264236AbUEXToB (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 15:44:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264430AbUEXToB (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 15:44:01 -0400 Received: from lvs00-fl-n03.valueweb.net ([216.219.253.136]:64926 "EHLO ams003.ftl.affinity.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264236AbUEXToA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 15:44:00 -0400 Message-ID: <40B2504B.6050208@coyotegulch.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:43:07 -0400 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040522) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NUMA Questions References: <1Zt9u-86V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > [hmm, didn't I answer this already?] Yes, you did, and I applied the patch earlier, prior to rebuilding the kernel and (of course) updating the kernel headers. Then I recompiled the numa utilities, with the result I detailed in the original post. I've just double-checked that /usr/include/asm/unistd.h includes your patch. ..Scott -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Software Invention for High-Performance Computing