From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264702AbUEXWEJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 18:04:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264705AbUEXWEI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 18:04:08 -0400 Received: from ns1.g-housing.de ([62.75.136.201]:11748 "EHLO mail.g-house.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264702AbUEXWCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 18:02:51 -0400 Message-ID: <40B27108.8090601@g-house.de> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 00:02:48 +0200 From: Christian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6+ (Windows/20040504) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tarballs of patchsets? References: <40B21F98.1080803@g-house.de> <20040524105552.311a990b.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040524105552.311a990b.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > The most practical way of doing this would be to download bitkeeper and do > a binary search. ok, i'll go with bk then. [...] > It's probably possible to do the same with the CVS tree - I haven't tried. thank you for your precious time for giving me live examples. i'm not very used to bk stuff but this will hoepfully help. kind regards, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #138: BNC (brain not connected)