From: "Brett E." <brettspamacct@fastclick.com>
To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@serpentine.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How can I optimize a process on a NUMA architecture(x86-64 specifically)?
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:09:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B29CB8.6040105@fastclick.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405241700.57249.habanero@us.ibm.com>
Andrew Theurer wrote:
> On Sunday 23 May 2004 09:28, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>>On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:28:09PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:42, Brett E. wrote:
>>>
>>>>Right now, 5 processes are running taking up a good deal of the CPU
>>>>doing memory-intensive work(cacheing) and I notice that none of the
>>>>processes seem to have CPU affinity.
>>>
>>>I don't know what kind of system you're running on, but if it's a
>>>multi-CPU Opteron, it is normally a sufficient fudge to just use
>>>sched_setaffinity to bind individual processes to specific CPUs. The
>>>mainline kernel memory allocator does the right thing in that case, and
>>>allocates memory locally when it can.
>>>
>>>You can use the taskset command to get at this from the command line, so
>>>you may not even need to modify your code.
>>
>>Linus also merged the NUMA API support into mainline now with 2.6.7rc1, so
>>you can use numactl for more finegrained tuning.
>
>
> FYI Brett, some Opteron systems have a BIOS option to interleave memory. If
> you are going to make use of NUMA, I think you want to not interleave.
Thanks for the heads up, I just disabled interleaving in the BIOS.
>
> Also, if you have a 25% imbalance within a domain/node, the scheduler can have
> a tendency to bounce around a task for fairness. That might be why you are
> seeing little/no affinity to a cpu (even top might be causing some of this).
> Not sure what the threshold is between domains/nodes, but I am curious if it
> still happens with CONFIG_NUMA on. If these are long lived cpu bound
> processes, I would try to have the number of processes be a multiple of the
> number of cpus.
I have CONFIG_NUMA on and yes these are long-lived processes(duration is
1 hour). And you and I are on the same wavelength, I'm imagining 3
processes per CPU with apache handing off work to the processes in
question. This is on a 1.6ghz 2-way opteron if that matters at all.
Hopefully I can make the modifications and test this tomorrow.
Thanks,
Brett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-25 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1Y6yr-eM-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1YbRm-4iF-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1Yma3-4cF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1YmjP-4jX-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-21 19:17 ` How can I optimize a process on a NUMA architecture(x86-64 specifically)? Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <1YmMN-4Kh-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1Yn67-50q-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-21 19:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-21 20:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-21 23:42 ` Brett E.
2004-05-22 6:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-22 7:41 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-23 0:28 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2004-05-23 14:28 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-24 22:00 ` Andrew Theurer
2004-05-25 0:27 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-05-25 1:09 ` Brett E. [this message]
[not found] ` <1YRnC-3vk-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-23 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-21 0:51 Brett E.
2004-05-21 1:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-21 6:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-21 17:27 ` Brett E.
2004-05-21 17:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-21 18:14 ` Brett E.
2004-05-21 18:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-21 18:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-21 19:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-23 2:49 ` David Schwartz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B29CB8.6040105@fastclick.com \
--to=brettspamacct@fastclick.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=bos@serpentine.com \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox