public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bringing back 'make symlinks'?
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 08:45:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B36A0E.5080509@kegel.com> (raw)

In the 2.4 kernel, 'make symlinks' created the symlinks needed
to use the kernel tree's headers for building a gcc/glibc toolchain.

In the 2.6 kernel, you can do the same thing with 'include include/asm'.
Unless you're trying to build arm or cris, or maybe others, in which case you also need
'include/asm-$(ARCH)/.arch'.

That's fine, but it means that a script (like crosstool) or a book (like LFS)
that's trying to build a gcc/glibc toolchain for both 2.4 and 2.6 ends up
with a section like

case "$KERNEL_VERSION.$KERNEL_PATCHLEVEL.x" in
2.2.x|2.4.x) make ARCH=$ARCH symlinks    include/linux/version.h
              ;;
2.6.x)       make ARCH=$ARCH include/asm include/linux/version.h
              case $ARCH in
              arm*|cris*) make ARCH=$ARCH include/asm-$ARCH/.arch
                          ;;
              esac
              ;;
*)           abort "Unsupported kernel version $KERNEL_VERSION.$KERNEL_PATCHLEVEL"
esac

which is a bit ugly.  It'd be nice if 'make symlinks' did the neccesary
stuff in 2.6, too.  Think a patch to do that would be accepted?
- Dan

-- 
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-25 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-25 15:45 Dan Kegel [this message]
2004-05-25 21:43 ` bringing back 'make symlinks'? Sam Ravnborg
2004-05-26  3:47   ` Dan Kegel
2004-05-30 10:55     ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-05-31 18:40       ` Dan Kegel
2004-05-31 20:16         ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40B36A0E.5080509@kegel.com \
    --to=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox