From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261389AbUE0FNj (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 01:13:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261416AbUE0FNj (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 01:13:39 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:30148 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261389AbUE0FNi (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 01:13:38 -0400 Message-ID: <40B578F1.3090704@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 01:13:21 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Zehetbauer CC: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64? References: <1085629714.6583.12.camel@hostmaster.org> In-Reply-To: <1085629714.6583.12.camel@hostmaster.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Zehetbauer wrote: > I wonder why there is no in-kernel irq balancing for the AMD64 > architecture yet. I guess this shouldn't be much different to the i386 > code. Someone willing to explain/provide a patch? Why do you think you need in-kernel irq balancing? Does userspace irqbalanced not work for you? Jeff