From: "Malte Schröder" <Malte.Schroeder@hanse.net>
To: Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: MalteSch@gmx.de, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad X-performance on 2.6.6 & 2.6.7-rc1 on x86-64
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B5AD70.7000903@hanse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1085615502.4543.26.camel@duergar>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| For completeness could you test the OSS emu10k driver (which supports
| PCM, while the ALSA driver does not) and see if you experience better
| overall performance? Like less CPU utilization etc... I'm very
| interested in finding out where the bottlenecks are. The emu10k1
| driver
| isn't perfect and neither are xine or mplayer so I'd like figure out
| what exactly is going on here. I'll of course do the same. It's just
| kind of hard to judge for me seeing as my system is now 4 years old.
I dont think it would make a difference sice cpu-time used by system is
really low since switching off mmap. But my overall experience with the
emu10k1 alsa-driver since it hit version 1.0 is quite good (before there
where some issues or should I say "annoyances" with the mixer). But if
you really want this I can rebuild my kernel and swith all that
oss-stuff back on ;)
Greets
- --
- ---------------------------------------
Malte Schröder
MalteSch@gmx.de
ICQ# 68121508
- ---------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAta1w4q3E2oMjYtURAt+AAJ0XTwmxsRsAgASfpfeWqs+DlQqdKwCfQ2Hy
dYqPGy93HVcqjYJTFsKyayE=
=nxDc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-27 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1ZqbC-5Gl-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-24 19:31 ` Bad X-performance on 2.6.6 & 2.6.7-rc1 on x86-64 Andi Kleen
2004-05-25 10:26 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-25 12:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-25 21:20 ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-25 21:32 ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-05-26 10:28 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-26 10:26 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-26 23:51 ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-27 8:57 ` Malte Schröder [this message]
2004-05-24 16:00 Malte Schröder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B5AD70.7000903@hanse.net \
--to=malte.schroeder@hanse.net \
--cc=MalteSch@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stan@ccs.neu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox