From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265205AbUE0UbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265200AbUE0UbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:23 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:4738 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265197AbUE0UbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:20 -0400 Message-ID: <40B6500B.5000009@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:07 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Lazara CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new nForce IDE/SATA device IDs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brian Lazara wrote: > We do plan on moving our SATA support to libata. cool > Patches for 2.4.27-pre2 and 2.6.6 to add device IDs for new nForce IDE > and SATA controllers. Rename some of the existing controller names to > correctly match released product names. The patch looks OK to me, though the final call is up to Bart. FWIW, when you included the patch inline, your email editor word-wrapped it so it will not apply. If Microsoft Outlook (or whatever) cannot produce decent patches, you may need to include your patches _twice_ -- once in plaintext (with annoying word wrap) for review, and once as you did initially, as a base64 attachment. Most MUA's are able to attach patches as plaintext (not base64), so see if there are setting you can flip... Jeff