From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@ThinRope.net>
To: "David N. Welton" <davidw@eidetix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot from usb flash - wake boot process when disk is ready?
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:37:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B7086D.9010904@ThinRope.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40B700F2.80208@eidetix.com>
David N. Welton wrote:
> [ Please CC replies to me - thanks! ]
>
> Hi,
>
> We're toying around with the idea of booting an embedded system off of
> USB flash (pros, cons, and advice about this would be appreciated, by
> the way), and I had a look at several of the existing patches to do this
> without going through the process of creating an initrd image. That
> adds complexity and time to the boot process that we would prefer to
> avoid, although it appears that the kernel folks in the first thread
> cited are in favor of initrd....
>
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0301.3/1182.html
>
> This mentions a couple of patches, both the "keep looping until it
> works" one, which I couldn't get working with 2.6.6, and Willy Tarreu's
> "wait a given period of time before continuing" patch:
>
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0405.0/0224.html
>
> I don't think either of those approaches are particularly elegant...
> although I'm sure my own efforts are good for a snort as well.
I tried this with 2.6.6 and modified it a bit, but to no avail.
It seems that the sd driver initializes the disk long before the wait
and does not bother anymore.
> In genhd.c I wake up a waitqueue when the disk comes on line. The
> init process waits on this before going on with prepare_namespace().
> Ideally, this would look and make sure it's the right disk, that
> selected for the root fs:-) Not being very familiar with the 'lay of
> the land' in the kernel, I declared the wait queue as a global in
> genhd.c. The thing I don't like about this approach is that it builds a
> connection between two bits of the kernel that seem separate... maybe
> (ok, quite probably) there is a better/cleaner way of doing this?
>
> Patch is at: http://dedasys.com/freesoftware/files/usb-wakeup.patch
Looks OK to me to try, but I am far from expert here.
Unfortunately I cannot test it in the next few days :-(
May be later.
I am in a search for non-initrd USB-booting as well...
Keep the discussion on LKML as well.
Kalin.
--
||///_ o *****************************
||//'_/> WWW: http://ThinRope.net/
|||\/<"
|||\\ '
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-28 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-28 9:05 boot from usb flash - wake boot process when disk is ready? David N. Welton
2004-05-28 9:28 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2004-05-28 9:33 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2004-05-28 9:37 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV [this message]
2004-05-28 12:12 ` Ben Collins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B7086D.9010904@ThinRope.net \
--to=kalin@thinrope.net \
--cc=davidw@eidetix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox