Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64?

Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28T17:58:20Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 234 bytes --]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:46:18AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
> Personally, I find the argument that it's hardware-specific control code
> a much better reason for it to belong in the kernel.

Is it really hardware specific ??

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]