From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Subject: [RFC, PATCH] set SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN for kmalloc caches
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:47:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B7A562.8040104@colorfullife.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]
Hi,
The recent patches that changed the default alignment for slab caches
affected the alignment of the kmalloc caches:
Initially the default was word alignment and it was increased for the
kmalloc caches by setting SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN.
The "align" patch changed the default to cache line alignment and
removed the SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN flag from the kmem_cache_create calls for
kmalloc.
But when the default was changed back to word alignment the flag was not
reintroduced for kmalloc.
I think the kmalloc caches should remain cache line aligned: the object
sizes are powers of two, so there is virtually no wasted memory. What
about the attached patch? I've added an arch override, perhaps someone
wants unaligned kmalloc caches (caused by word offsets for coloring
instead of cache line offsets).
An arch override is definitively needed: One of SGI's drivers needs
cache line alignment due to hardware constraints.
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-slab-kmallocalign --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]
// $Header$
// Kernel Version:
// VERSION = 2
// PATCHLEVEL = 6
// SUBLEVEL = 6
// EXTRAVERSION = -mm5
--- 2.6/mm/slab.c 2004-05-23 21:11:54.000000000 +0200
+++ build-2.6/mm/slab.c 2004-05-28 22:14:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@
#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN 0
#endif
+#ifndef ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS
+#define ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN
+#endif
+
/* Legal flag mask for kmem_cache_create(). */
#if DEBUG
# define CREATE_MASK (SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL | SLAB_RED_ZONE | \
@@ -756,7 +760,7 @@
* allow tighter packing of the smaller caches. */
sizes->cs_cachep = kmem_cache_create(
names->name, sizes->cs_size,
- ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, 0, NULL, NULL);
+ ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS, NULL, NULL);
if (!sizes->cs_cachep)
BUG();
@@ -768,7 +772,8 @@
sizes->cs_dmacachep = kmem_cache_create(
names->name_dma, sizes->cs_size,
- ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, SLAB_CACHE_DMA, NULL, NULL);
+ ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS|SLAB_CACHE_DMA,
+ NULL, NULL);
if (!sizes->cs_dmacachep)
BUG();
@@ -1118,8 +1123,9 @@
* %SLAB_NO_REAP - Don't automatically reap this cache when we're under
* memory pressure.
*
- * %SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN - This flag has no effect and will be removed soon.
- *
+ * %SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN - Align the objects in this cache to a hardware
+ * cacheline. This can be beneficial if you're counting cycles as closely
+ * as davem.
*/
kmem_cache_t *
kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-28 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-28 20:47 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2004-05-28 23:25 ` [RFC, PATCH] set SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN for kmalloc caches Andrew Morton
2004-05-29 6:57 ` Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B7A562.8040104@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=dcn@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox