From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265227AbUE2PvQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 11:51:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265230AbUE2PvQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 11:51:16 -0400 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:60290 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265227AbUE2PvP (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 11:51:15 -0400 Message-ID: <40B8A37D.1090802@myrealbox.com> Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 07:51:41 -0700 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Subject: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have one machine with a gigabit NIC which I updated today from Linus' bk tree. The problem is that I was not asked if I wanted the 'new' gigabit support and therefore the tg3 support was dropped from my new .config. I edited .config by hand and deleted any mention of ethernet support -- and only then did 'make oldconfig' ask me the right questions. Also: the phrase (10 or 100Mbit) should be deleted from the 'Ethernet' menu item since it implies (wrongly) that the item is not needed for gigabit support. Thanks!