From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264697AbUEaRei (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 13:34:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264702AbUEaRei (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 13:34:38 -0400 Received: from smtp-roam.Stanford.EDU ([171.64.10.152]:18323 "EHLO smtp-roam.Stanford.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264697AbUEaReh (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 13:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: <40BB6CA8.9070307@myrealbox.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 10:34:32 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MM patches (was Re: why swap at all?) References: <200405291031.02564.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <40B84C85.8010207@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <40B84C85.8010207@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > Yep. > > Thanks to everyone's input I was able to test and adapt my mm work. > It is hopefully at a stage where it can have wider testing now. It > is stable on my SMP system under very heavy swapping, but the usual > caution applies. Thanks! This feels quite a bit better on my system. I'll try and stress it a bit more later today or tomorrow, but my system is now usable under heavy io load. --Andy