From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261787AbUEaW5n (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 18:57:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263154AbUEaW5n (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 18:57:43 -0400 Received: from vsmtp1b.tin.it ([212.216.176.141]:59880 "EHLO vsmtp1.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261787AbUEaW5m (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 18:57:42 -0400 Message-ID: <40BBB861.1010002@stanchina.net> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:57:37 +0200 From: Flavio Stanchina User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040401 Debian/1.6-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: swappiness=0 makes software suspend fail. References: <200405280000.56742.rob@landley.net> <20040529222308.GA1535@elf.ucw.cz> <20040531031743.0d7566e3.akpm@osdl.org> <200405310638.21015.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200405310638.21015.rob@landley.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob Landley wrote: > Of course, mounting/fscking any of the filesystems in question would kinda > screw that up too, [...] That reminds me of a question I wanted to ask for a long time. Why doesn't suspend just remount everything read-only before saving the memory image? Would that be impossible in this context? I find it quite scary to have my filesystems dirty *and* part of my files saved in the memory image. -- Ciao, Flavio