From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265125AbUFARLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:11:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265130AbUFARLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:11:06 -0400 Received: from 209-128-98-078.bayarea.net ([209.128.98.78]:22145 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265125AbUFARKd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:10:33 -0400 Message-ID: <40BCB864.7000308@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 10:09:56 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikael Pettersson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.6-rc3] gcc-3.4.0 fixes References: <200404292146.i3TLkfI0019612@harpo.it.uu.se> <16572.38987.239160.819836@alkaid.it.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <16572.38987.239160.819836@alkaid.it.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > You're assuming pointers have uniform representation. > C makes no such guarantees, and machines _have_ had > different types of representations in the past. > And are there *any* such architectures for which gcc are targetted. I'm not advocating advancing this to the C standard, I'm advocating not removing an extension which has been documented for a decade. -hpa