Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation

Anton Blanchard
2004-06-07T07:55:20Z

> aargh! It's back!

Its stalking you.

> There's something about this patch which make me break out in hives. Does
> it *really* need to be that complicated?

If we dont want maximum backwards compatibility we can get rid of the <
sizeof(long) bits.

> iirc, the last time I looked through this I was unable to convince myself
> that it was endianness-correct. Is it?

Should be, but we could boot it on something 64bit little endian to prove
it.

Anton