From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
ktech@wanadoo.es,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7-rc1 breaks forcedeth
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:13:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C35ED7.1080000@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406060957410.7010@ppc970.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But it's usually a good thing to try to reset a device as much as possible
> when you probe for it. If for no other reason than the fact that then
> you'll have it in a "known state", and hopefully there won't be as many
> surprises..
Strongly agreed. I stress this, in Linux driver writing talks and
rants, to whomever will listen as "the proper way to do things in Linux".
Presuming things about a device's state upon entry to the driver has led
to bugs in the past. Popular bugs include assuming (a) MAC address
registers hold a valid/useful value or (b) ethernet NIC's DMA engine is
not active. Both of these are quite often not true when you take into
account driver re-loads, warm reboots, and firmware features such as USB
kbd/mouse/storage or PXE booting from a network.
A good driver unconditionally makes sure the device is inactive in its
probe function (struct pci_driver::probe), before registering itself
with any kernel subsystems. This must also be done before request_irq
and before enabling the bus-mastering bit in PCI_COMMAND register.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-06 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-06 1:59 2.6.7-rc1 breaks forcedeth ktech
2004-06-06 3:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-06 8:36 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-06 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-06 18:13 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-06-06 18:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-06 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-16 18:40 David Mansfield
2004-06-06 13:49 jjluza
[not found] <E1BWxTh-0002dx-KR@mb06.in.mad.eresmas.com>
2004-06-06 13:31 ` Daniel Schmitt
2004-06-06 12:10 ktech
2004-06-06 12:53 ` Vincent van de Camp
2004-06-06 13:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-06 14:17 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-05 23:41 Luis Miguel García Mancebo
2004-06-05 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-31 0:29 jjluza
2004-05-30 17:54 Luis Miguel García Mancebo
2004-05-30 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-30 15:57 Lee Howard
2004-05-30 17:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-30 22:59 ` Lee Howard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C35ED7.1080000@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=ktech@wanadoo.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox