From: Sebastian Kloska <kloska@scienion.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: APM realy sucks on 2.6.x
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C46F7F.7060703@scienion.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040607123839.GC11860@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>My impression is that APM is slowly degenerating while ACPI is not
>>(yet ?) able to fill the gap. The suspend feature of ACPI is stated to
>>be dangerous and experimental and does not work for me at all.
>
>
> That sounds about right.
>
>
>>After all this bashing...
>>
>>Is there anyone out there who has the same experiences ?
>>
>>Is there a workaround ?
>>
>>Is it possible to somehow downgrade APM in the 2.6 kernel
>>to the 2.4.x state ?
>>
>>How could one debug this kind of missbehaviour ? Where do
>>I have to look for potential miss configurations of the system ?
>>
>>I'm really willing to help the APM developers to track down this bug
>>but don't have a clue how to debug this kind stuff.
>
>
> What APM developers? There are none as far as I know.
Hmmm ... So once again the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus :-) ?
At least a
grep '<.*@' /usr/src/linux-2.6.6/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c | sed 's/.*<//' | sed 's/>.*//'
gives me:
<snip>
Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de
jtoth@princeton.edu
gaudet@arctic.org
cananian@alumni.princeton.edu
echter@informatik.uni-rostock.de
rankinc@bellsouth.net
cmiller@surfsouth.com
rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
laslo@wodip.opole.pl
ross@soi.city.ac.uk
borislav@lix.polytechnique.fr
sitta@al.unipmn.it
teras@writeme.com
Walter.Hofmann@physik.stud.uni-erlangen.de
skawina@geocities.com
rusty@rustcorp.com.au
gis88564@cis.nctu.edu.tw
jima@hal.com
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
jima@hal.com
andy_henroid@yahoo.com
pavel@suse.cz
andy_henroid@yahoo.com
zlatko@iskon.hr
crutcher+kernel@datastacks.com
arjanv@redhat.com
marc@mbsi.ca
alan@redhat.com
alan@redhat.com
jdthood@mail.com
chief@bandits.org
ast@domdv.de
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
jdthood@mail.com
reese@isn.net
neale@lowendale.com.au
cmiller@surfsouth.com
chen@ctpa04.mit.edu
</snip>
This is pretty much for no one. And I guess you knew since you're on
the list yourself. But I think you're right when meaning
that there is not much of active maintenance anymore. Which at
least I find a little bit discouraging when looking of the state
of the ACPI support.
>
> Try removing calls to device_* in apm.c. Better yet become APM
> developer.
It seems like I'm on my way to do so (still reluctantly). As I stated
in my previous mails I'm not born as a hardware/BIOS hacker (more the
application C++/Java stuff) but I'm willing to learn. When I'm
grown up I definitely want to be linux kernel hacker :-) ...
Currently I ripped down the 2.6.6 kernel to almost nothing
and add one module after the other checking for proper
suspend/resume behavior....
The most suspicious candidates on my list are currently the
USB-UHCI driver and the ALSA sound system, which is my #1 candidate
since it has not been an integral part of the 2.4.x (x<=20) kernels.
So if anybody out there could give me guidance on how the apm code
might interact with the ALSA sound system it would be highly
appreciated....
Thanks
Sebastian
> Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-04 21:26 APM realy sucks on 2.6.x Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-04 23:14 ` Keith Duthie
2004-06-05 8:03 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-04 23:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-06-05 17:18 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-06 3:29 ` Michael Clark
2004-06-06 4:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-06 13:56 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 12:38 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 13:37 ` Sebastian Kloska [this message]
2004-06-07 14:05 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 14:28 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 14:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 19:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-07 21:13 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 4:16 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 7:12 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 8:58 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 9:02 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 9:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 9:50 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 23:59 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 17:48 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-06-08 18:59 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2004-06-08 20:18 ` Ian Stirling
2004-06-07 14:42 ` Keith Duthie
2004-06-07 14:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 14:47 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 14:51 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 15:09 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 16:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 15:19 ` Keith Duthie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-07 8:11 Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 9:49 Sau Dan Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C46F7F.7060703@scienion.de \
--to=kloska@scienion.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox