From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>,
"Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>, "Chris Mason" <mason@suse.com>,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STACK] >3k call path in reiserfs
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:31:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C9C247.4070702@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C91DA0.6060705@namesys.com>
Hans Reiser wrote:
> This is all part of what responsible release management is about. I
> was the junior whiz kid in professional release management teams before
> starting Namesys. I listened to my elders and learned from them. My
> standards for professional conduct in this arena are higher than yours
> as a result of that.
> You are a bunch of young kids who lack professional experience in
> release management. That is ok, but don't get aggressive about it.
>
> I have no desire to pay for your mistakes, and as the official
> maintainer it is my responsibility to ensure that neither I nor the
> users pay for the mistakes of those who add bugs to stable branches
> instead of adding them to the development branches where they belong.
Don't get condescending. Immature people don't like to be told that
they are immature. :)
Anyhow, I agree with you. V3 should remain unchanged. If Linux wants
ReiserFS AND 4K stacks, they're going to have to wait for V4.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-09 12:22 [STACK] >3k call path in reiserfs Jörn Engel
2004-06-09 12:31 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-09 16:53 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-09 17:06 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-09 17:15 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-09 18:04 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-09 18:20 ` Dave Jones
2004-06-09 23:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-10 22:35 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-11 2:49 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-11 7:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-11 13:46 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-11 16:32 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-11 16:50 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-11 17:08 ` Paul Wagland
2004-06-11 17:46 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-11 18:07 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-11 14:31 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
2004-06-11 14:42 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-09 17:28 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-09 18:09 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-09 18:34 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-09 23:42 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-11 13:49 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-11 16:34 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-09 18:48 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-09 18:53 ` Jörn Engel
2004-06-09 23:44 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-10 9:08 ` Vladimir Saveliev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C9C247.4070702@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox