From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266095AbUFPDIY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:08:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266094AbUFPDIY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:08:24 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.169.226]:45750 "HELO smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266095AbUFPDFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:05:38 -0400 Message-ID: <40CFB8FD.2010601@yahoo.com.au> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:05:33 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040401 Debian/1.6-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Xu CC: "Martin J. Bligh" , mingo@elte.hu, kernel@kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au, akpm@osdl.org, wli@holomorphy.com, torvalds@osdl.org, markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance regression in 2.6.7-rc3 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Herbert Xu wrote: > Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>How the hell can that have any effect on non-threaded workloads? Perhaps >>some part of kernel compile *is* multi-threaded. It does seem to get > > > make(1) with vfork(2) perhaps? I think balance on clone probably needs to be turned off by default presently. It slows down a simple thread creation test by a factor of 7(!) here, and has quite a few not too difficult to imagine performance problems.