From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ext3-users@redhat.com,
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Subject: Re: mode data=journal in ext3. Is it safe to use?
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:55:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D1CD0F.4030306@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040617100813.GA19280@redhat.com>
Dave Jones wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:35:50PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > >the reluctance of the developers to adapt to the 4K kernel stacks in
> > >2.6.recent,
> > >
> > do you use them? I don't know real users who do, or else I would be
> > quicker to care.
>
>The Fedora Core 2 kernel (and what will be RHEL4) is currently
>using 4K stacks. This makes up quite a large userbase.
>
>
Sigh. I guess we have to support it then.
Chris, are you up to doing it?
> > On the one hand, you complain about how we were unstable, and on the
> > other hand you complain about how we aren't willing to destabilize the
> > code to add new features to what is no longer the development branch.
> > Seems pretty inconsistent logically to me.
>
>If you really are reluctant it fix it, there's always the option of
>marking CONFIG_REISER4 as dependant on CONFIG_BROKEN if CONFIG_4KSTACKS
>is selected.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-17 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40FB8221D224C44393B0549DDB7A5CE83E31B1@tor.lokal.lan>
2004-06-15 18:09 ` mode data=journal in ext3. Is it safe to use? Petter Larsen
2004-06-15 18:20 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-06-17 8:36 ` Petter Larsen
2004-06-16 7:34 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-06-17 8:27 ` Petter Larsen
2004-06-17 17:09 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-06-18 9:41 ` Helge Hafting
2004-06-18 10:15 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-06-18 11:30 ` Paulo Marques
2004-06-18 12:05 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-06-21 17:42 ` mode data=journal in ext3. Is it safe to use? Conclusion Petter Larsen
2004-06-19 19:16 ` mode data=journal in ext3. Is it safe to use? Bernd Eckenfels
2004-06-16 15:49 ` Timothy Miller
2004-06-17 0:51 ` Daniel Pittman
2004-06-17 3:02 ` Tim Connors
2004-06-17 5:35 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-17 10:08 ` Dave Jones
2004-06-17 16:55 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-06-17 8:29 ` Petter Larsen
2004-06-17 19:30 ` Daniel Egger
[not found] ` <87wu26mto2.fsf@enki.rimspace.net>
2004-06-27 14:17 ` Petter Larsen
2004-06-28 0:22 ` Daniel Pittman
[not found] ` <1805.216.148.213.196.1087426691.squirrel@www.code-visions.com>
2004-06-17 11:23 ` Petter Larsen
2004-06-17 16:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-06-17 14:56 Ken Ryan
2004-06-17 16:06 ` Timothy Miller
2004-06-17 17:20 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-17 19:15 ` Ken Ryan
2004-06-18 6:18 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-17 19:43 ` Daniel Egger
2004-06-17 19:59 ` Ken Ryan
2004-06-19 14:49 ` Petter Larsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D1CD0F.4030306@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@rimspace.net \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox