Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Andrew Walrond]

The addition of a
	__user
attribute to a line in
	linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
causes iptables build to fail unless I export
	CC="gcc -D__user= "

Presumably ip_tables.h should include a header defining __user, or iptables 
should include the relevant header before ip_tables.h ?

Sorry if this has already been reported; Archive search found nothing on 
either ML.

Andrew Walrond

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[David Ford]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]

Iptables should be using linux-libc-headers headers instead of kernel 
headers.

Remove -I$(KERNEL_DIR)/include from your makefile, see this patch here: 
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/patches/iptables.patch 
<http://ep09.pld-linux.org/%7Emmazur/linux-libc-headers/patches/iptables.patch>

David

Andrew Walrond wrote:

>The addition of a
>	__user
>attribute to a line in
>	linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
>causes iptables build to fail unless I export
>	CC="gcc -D__user= "
>
>Presumably ip_tables.h should include a header defining __user, or iptables 
>should include the relevant header before ip_tables.h ?
>
>Sorry if this has already been reported; Archive search found nothing on 
>either ML.
>
>Andrew Walrond
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
>

[-- Attachment #2: david+challenge-response.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 183 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:David Ford
n:Ford;David
email;internet:david@blue-labs.org
title:Industrial Geek
tel;home:Ask please
tel;cell:(203) 650-3611
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Andrew Walrond]

Hi David,

On Friday 18 Jun 2004 17:10, David Ford wrote:
> Iptables should be using linux-libc-headers headers instead of kernel
> headers.

Is this acquired knowledge, or new Netfilter policy?
How dependant are the iptables tools on the specifc kernel running?

Ie
Can I build iptables for use on 2.6.7 kernel with 2.6.6 linux-libc-headers? 
(probably)

But could I build iptables for 2.6.7 kernel with 2.4.20 linux-libc-headers? 
(probably not?)

The INSTALL file states specifically to use 
KERNEL_DIR=<<where-you-built-your-kernel>>

Andrew

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[David Ford]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 988 bytes --]

The current linux libc headers package is much more frequently updated 
and closely matches released kernels.  LLH is a sanitized linux headers 
package and is currently based on 2.6.6 headers.

Yes you can build iptables on 2.6.6 for a 2.6.7 kernel.  I have built 
iptables once or twice a year and built kernels once or twice a week.  
Iptables continues to work fine.

David

Andrew Walrond wrote:

>Hi David,
>
>On Friday 18 Jun 2004 17:10, David Ford wrote:
>  
>
>>Iptables should be using linux-libc-headers headers instead of kernel
>>headers.
>>    
>>
>
>Is this acquired knowledge, or new Netfilter policy?
>How dependant are the iptables tools on the specifc kernel running?
>
>Ie
>Can I build iptables for use on 2.6.7 kernel with 2.6.6 linux-libc-headers? 
>(probably)
>
>But could I build iptables for 2.6.7 kernel with 2.4.20 linux-libc-headers? 
>(probably not?)
>
>The INSTALL file states specifically to use 
>KERNEL_DIR=<<where-you-built-your-kernel>>
>
>Andrew
>  
>

[-- Attachment #2: david+challenge-response.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 183 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:David Ford
n:Ford;David
email;internet:david@blue-labs.org
title:Industrial Geek
tel;home:Ask please
tel;cell:(203) 650-3611
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Kalin KOZHUHAROV]

Andrew Walrond wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Friday 18 Jun 2004 17:10, David Ford wrote:
> 
>>Iptables should be using linux-libc-headers headers instead of kernel
>>headers.
> 
> 
> Is this acquired knowledge, or new Netfilter policy?
> How dependant are the iptables tools on the specifc kernel running?
> 
> Ie
> Can I build iptables for use on 2.6.7 kernel with 2.6.6 linux-libc-headers? 
> (probably)
> 
> But could I build iptables for 2.6.7 kernel with 2.4.20 linux-libc-headers? 
> (probably not?)
> 
> The INSTALL file states specifically to use 
> KERNEL_DIR=<<where-you-built-your-kernel>>
> 
> Andrew

Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.9 I got:
gcc -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe -Iinclude -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include  -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.9\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o -c extensions/libipt_stealth.c
distcc[6323] ERROR: compile on localhost failed
In file included from include/libiptc/libiptc.h:6,
                 from include/iptables.h:5,
                 from extensions/libipt_stealth.c:10:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: error: syntax error before '*' token
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:259: error: syntax error before '}' token
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `DECLARE_MUTEX'
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: `DECLARE_MUTEX' declared `static' but never defined
make: *** [extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o] Error 1

Last time I recompiled it with 2.6.6 it was ok. The compiled version still seems to work with 2.6.7 for now.

However, isn't that supposed to be filed with iptables (@netfilter.org)?

Kalin.

-- 
||///_ o  *****************************
||//'_/>     WWW: http://ThinRope.net/

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <40D31EA6.5030207@ThinRope.net> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:56:06 +0900), Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@ThinRope.net> says:

> Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.9 I got:
> gcc -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe -Iinclude -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include  -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.9\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o -c extensions/libipt_stealth.c
> distcc[6323] ERROR: compile on localhost failed
> In file included from include/libiptc/libiptc.h:6,
>                  from include/iptables.h:5,
>                  from extensions/libipt_stealth.c:10:
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: error: syntax error before '*' token
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:259: error: syntax error before '}' token
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `DECLARE_MUTEX'
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: `DECLARE_MUTEX' declared `static' but never defined
> make: *** [extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o] Error 1
> 
> Last time I recompiled it with 2.6.6 it was ok. The compiled version still seems to work with 2.6.7 for now.

Please try this. Thanks

===== include/linux/netfilter.h 1.9 vs edited =====
--- 1.9/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
+++ edited/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-19 02:10:55 +09:00
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #endif
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 /* Responses from hook functions. */
 #define NF_DROP 0
===== include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h 1.3 vs edited =====
--- 1.3/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-04 09:52:00 +09:00
+++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:09 +09:00
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/if_arp.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #endif
-
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_arp.h>
 
 #define ARPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
+++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:39 +09:00
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/ip.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #endif
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
 
 #define IPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
@@ -336,8 +337,8 @@
 /*
  *	Main firewall chains definitions and global var's definitions.
  */
-static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
+static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 extern void ipt_init(void) __init;
===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h 1.6 vs edited =====
--- 1.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:04 +09:00
+++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:09:29 +09:00
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/ipv6.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #endif
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
 
 #define IP6T_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
@@ -106,7 +107,9 @@
 	u_int64_t pcnt, bcnt;			/* Packet and byte counters */
 };
 
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
 static DECLARE_MUTEX(ip6t_mutex);
+#endif
 
 /* Values for "flag" field in struct ip6t_ip6 (general ip6 structure). */
 #define IP6T_F_PROTO		0x01	/* Set if rule cares about upper 

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Kalin KOZHUHAROV]

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> In article <40D31EA6.5030207@ThinRope.net> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:56:06 +0900), Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@ThinRope.net> says:
> 
> 
>>Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.9 I got:
>>gcc -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe -Iinclude -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include  -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.9\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o -c extensions/libipt_stealth.c
>>distcc[6323] ERROR: compile on localhost failed
>>In file included from include/libiptc/libiptc.h:6,
>>                 from include/iptables.h:5,
>>                 from extensions/libipt_stealth.c:10:
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: error: syntax error before '*' token
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:259: error: syntax error before '}' token
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `DECLARE_MUTEX'
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
>>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: `DECLARE_MUTEX' declared `static' but never defined
>>make: *** [extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o] Error 1
>>
>>Last time I recompiled it with 2.6.6 it was ok. The compiled version still seems to work with 2.6.7 for now.
> 
> 
> Please try this. Thanks
> 
> ===== include/linux/netfilter.h 1.9 vs edited =====
> --- 1.9/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-19 02:10:55 +09:00
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  
>  /* Responses from hook functions. */
>  #define NF_DROP 0
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h 1.3 vs edited =====
> --- 1.3/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-04 09:52:00 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:09 +09:00
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/if_arp.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> -
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_arp.h>
>  
>  #define ARPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h 1.7 vs edited =====
> --- 1.7/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:39 +09:00
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ip.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
>  
>  #define IPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> @@ -336,8 +337,8 @@
>  /*
>   *	Main firewall chains definitions and global var's definitions.
>   */
> -static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> +static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  extern void ipt_init(void) __init;
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h 1.6 vs edited =====
> --- 1.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:04 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:09:29 +09:00
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
>  
>  #define IP6T_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> @@ -106,7 +107,9 @@
>  	u_int64_t pcnt, bcnt;			/* Packet and byte counters */
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>  static DECLARE_MUTEX(ip6t_mutex);
> +#endif
>  
>  /* Values for "flag" field in struct ip6t_ip6 (general ip6 structure). */
>  #define IP6T_F_PROTO		0x01	/* Set if rule cares about upper 
> 
As far as I understand from this patch, this should be applied to the system headers...
I thought `diff -Nru A B` was the format of choice in LKML...

Anyway, thank you for the patch, but I am not thinking to patch linux-headers, as I like to refer to them as something more or less stable (As opposed to the current kernel).

And just out of curiosity, I did:

include $ patch --dry-run -p2 </tmp/test.diff 
patching file linux/netfilter.h
patching file linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h
patching file linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 337.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h.rej
patching file linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h.rej

My system has linux-headers-2.4.21 installed.

As I said in my other mail here, I will stick with `make KERNEL_DIR=/usr` for now.

Kalin.

-- 
||///_ o  *****************************
||//'_/>     WWW: http://ThinRope.net/

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <40D3361B.5020304@ThinRope.net> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:36:11 +0900), Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@ThinRope.net> says:

> As far as I understand from this patch, this should be applied to the system headers...

Patch is for current linux-2.5 bk tree,
not for linux-headers.

Please try to patch your kernel and set KERNEL_DIR to 
/path/to/your/kernel when you compile iptables.

Thanks.

--yoshfuji

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <200406191038.51118.andrew@walrond.org> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:38:50 +0100), Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> says:

> On Friday 18 Jun 2004 18:18, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> >
> > Please try this. Thanks
> >
> 
> I can confirm that iptables-1.2.10 builds fine with your patch applied to 
> linux-2.6.7

Thanks. David?

--yoshfuji

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[David S. Miller]

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:35:27 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ^[$B5HF#1QL@^[(B <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> wrote:

> In article <200406191038.51118.andrew@walrond.org> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:38:50 +0100), Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> says:
> 
> > On Friday 18 Jun 2004 18:18, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ^[$B5HF#1QL@^[(B wrote:
> > >
> > > Please try this. Thanks
> > >
> > 
> > I can confirm that iptables-1.2.10 builds fine with your patch applied to 
> > linux-2.6.7
> 
> Thanks. David?

Applied.

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Andrew Walrond]

On Friday 18 Jun 2004 17:56, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>
> However, isn't that supposed to be filed with iptables (@netfilter.org)?
>

My original mail was addressed to netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, and cc'ed to 
lkml

Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Kalin KOZHUHAROV]

Andrew Walrond wrote:
> On Friday 18 Jun 2004 17:56, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> 
>>However, isn't that supposed to be filed with iptables (@netfilter.org)?
> 
> My original mail was addressed to netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, and cc'ed to 
> lkml
What can I say :-| NB to myself: Kalin, _DO_ read Subject, To, CC for all post in LKML
Sorry.

So, I was poking around for the last hour or so and found quite a few things.
It seems that most people prefer to build iptables against linux-headers supplied by their distribution and not the running kernel. I agreed on that. Although a few distributions may lag behind updating linux-headers, it should be the preferred way as it is stable.

I just downloaded and compiled iptables-1.2.10 against my  system headers using `make KERNEL_DIR=/usr` (haven't actually run it, but it should work).

Well of course if you want the latest-and-greatest extensions, you might try to compile against your running kernel, but you are on your own (with help from netfilter.org).

Kalin.

-- 
||///_ o  *****************************
||//'_/>     WWW: http://ThinRope.net/