From: Jamey Hicks <jamey.hicks@hp.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
greg@kroah.com, tony@atomide.com, david-b@pacbell.net,
joshua@joshuawise.com
Subject: Re: DMA API issues
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:22:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D340FB.3080309@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087584769.2134.119.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley wrote:
>You still haven't explained what you want to do though. Apart from the
>occasional brush with usbstorage, I don't have a good knowledge of the
>layout of the USB drivers. I assume you simply want to persuade the
>ohci driver to use your memory area somehow, but what do you actually
>want the ohci driver to do with it? And how much leeway do you get to
>customise the driver.
>
>
>
It's really not a question of laziness. The ASICs we are interested in
implement OHCI, so I think the core OHCI driver should work unmodified.
OHCI driver allocates dma_pools for managing endpoint descriptors (ED)
and transaction descriptors (TD). I expect that the driver wrapper that
initializes the OHCI controller driver will create dma_pools drawing
from the ASIC's private SRAM. The OHCI driver uses
dma_{alloc,free}_coherent to manage the space used for the top level
control structure shared between the driver and the controller
hardware. This also needs to be allocated in the SRAM. Finally, in
drivers/usb/core/usb.c, the USB drivers call dma_map_single and
dma_unmap_single given pointers to transfer buffers allocated by the USB
device drivers. If the USB device is a network device (as it is on the
iPAQ), the transfer buffers are allocated via dev_alloc_skb.
>The reason I'm asking is beause it's still unclear whether this is a DMA
>API issue or an ohci one. I could solve my Q720 issue simply by
>exporting an interface from the ncr driver to supply alternative memory
>allocation use and descriptors.
>
>
>
I really think this is a DMA API implementation issue. The problem
touches more than the USB drivers. I say implementation because the DMA
API already takes struct device, so the public interface would not have
to change or would not have to change much. However, we would like to
be able to provide device-specific implementations of the dma
operations. One way to implement this would be a pointer to
dma_operations from struct device.
Jamey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-18 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 18:20 DMA API issues James Bottomley
2004-06-18 18:35 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 18:52 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 18:57 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 19:20 ` David Brownell
2004-06-18 19:44 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 19:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 21:08 ` David Brownell
2004-06-18 21:14 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 22:38 ` David Brownell
2004-06-18 23:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 23:31 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-19 18:23 ` David Brownell
2004-06-19 20:41 ` Russell King
2004-06-19 21:46 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-19 22:49 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-20 13:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-20 15:50 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-20 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-20 16:57 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-20 20:15 ` David Brownell
2004-06-20 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-20 18:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-06-20 19:27 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-20 19:34 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-06-20 20:07 ` David Brownell
2004-06-20 20:18 ` David Brownell
2004-06-20 20:02 ` David Brownell
2004-06-18 23:25 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 23:29 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 23:51 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-19 0:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-19 0:14 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-19 3:49 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-20 20:59 ` Jamey Hicks
2004-06-19 15:11 ` DMA API issues... summary Ian Molton
2004-06-20 20:49 ` Joshua Wise
2004-06-18 19:30 ` DMA API issues James Bottomley
2004-06-18 19:56 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 19:22 ` Jamey Hicks [this message]
2004-06-18 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 20:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-06-18 20:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 20:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-06-18 20:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 21:20 ` Russell King
2004-06-18 23:20 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-20 18:25 ` Deepak Saxena
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-18 16:59 Ian Molton
2004-06-18 18:07 ` Matt Porter
2004-06-18 18:19 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 18:58 ` Matt Porter
2004-06-18 18:33 ` Jamey Hicks
2004-06-18 19:21 ` Matt Porter
2004-06-18 19:43 ` Russell King
2004-06-21 13:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-21 23:08 ` Russell King
2004-06-22 2:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-22 3:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-22 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-22 10:40 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-23 12:34 ` Russell King
2004-06-23 15:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-23 15:44 ` Russell King
2004-06-23 16:01 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-23 16:10 ` Russell King
2004-06-22 10:48 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-18 19:48 ` Jamey Hicks
2004-06-18 21:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-18 22:12 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-06-18 23:27 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 23:26 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-18 23:30 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <20040619005714.37b68453.spyro@f2s.com>
[not found] ` <40D3838B.2070608@pobox.com>
[not found] ` <20040619011621.4491600a.spyro@f2s.com>
[not found] ` <40D3872F.5010007@pobox.com>
2004-06-19 0:34 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-19 21:15 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D340FB.3080309@hp.com \
--to=jamey.hicks@hp.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=joshua@joshuawise.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox