public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashkc@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: 2.6.7-ck1, cfq ionice?
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:00:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D4A962.7030508@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406162122.51430.kernel@kolivas.org>

So,

I have been using 2.6.7-ck1 for a few days now and must say it is simply 
*great*. Everything is working as it should, but only better. :-) Even 
ut2004 seems to be much smoother using staircase, some people reported 
15% more fps (I haven't measured), but it runs as smooth as ut2003 did 
previously with Nick's scheduler (before the O(1) scheduler was updated 
to its current state in mm).

The only thing left, which is a major pain for me, is disk i/o. Once it 
starts performance goes down, I think even more with staircase than with 
Nick's but this could be due to faster feel of staircase in general...

Example: When I do a emerge rsync in gentoo a tree consisting of nearly 
9000 files gets synced and a cache is built which causes a lot of random 
access on hd. So when I try to use thunderbird mailer at the same time, 
it act like a snail now due to concurrent disk access.

As I understood the cfq ionice part would solve this issue. I never 
tried it, as I think I never had a kernel containing it (and never had 
such a desperate need for it :-). Reading your changelog, it is not 
included anymore in ck1. So should I beg Jens Axboe for a rediff or new 
patch or how to get this piece inside? I think it is the only thing left 
for the next to perfect desktop experience I ever had.

Cheers,

Prakash

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-19 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-16 11:22 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-18 16:28 ` 2.6.7-ck1 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-19  3:48   ` 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-19  5:20     ` 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-19  8:39       ` 2.6.7-ck1 Felipe Alfaro Solana
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406182004370.32121@alpha.polcom.net>
2004-06-19  4:06     ` 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-19  5:26       ` 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-19 16:25         ` 2.6.7-ck1 Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-06-19 16:38           ` 2.6.7-ck1 Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 22:46   ` 2.6.7-ck1 Pavel Machek
2004-06-28 20:52     ` 2.6.7-ck1 kernel
2004-06-29  8:19     ` 2.6.7-ck1 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-19 21:00 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam [this message]
2004-06-19 21:05   ` 2.6.7-ck1, cfq ionice? Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-19 23:18   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-20  7:40     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-21 16:02 ` 2.6.7-ck1 Brian S. Stephan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40D4A962.7030508@gmx.de \
    --to=prakashkc@gmx.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox