From: "Espen Fjellvær Olsen" <eldiablo@svorka.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:35:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D851BA.1050305@svorka.net> (raw)
In the recent past, there has been released many new types of both disk
and cpu schedulers, i wonder wich of them i should use to get best
performance on my desktop system?
Nickshed v30g, or maybe staircase 7.1, or spa, hudra, hybrid and so on,
those are all quite new IO schedulers.
Also there has been som new releases of the CFQ cpu scheduler, and som
addons to this, cfq-ionice and so on.
What scheduler combination do you use?
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-22 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-22 15:35 Espen Fjellvær Olsen [this message]
2004-06-22 16:05 ` [Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?] Espen Fjellvær Olsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D851BA.1050305@svorka.net \
--to=eldiablo@svorka.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox