[Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?]

[Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?]

[Espen Fjellvær Olsen]

In the recent past, there has been released many new types of both disk 
and cpu schedulers, i wonder wich of them i should use to get best
performance on my desktop system?
Nickshed v30g, or maybe staircase 7.1, or spa, hudra, hybrid and so on,
those are all quite new IO schedulers.
Also there has been som new releases of the CFQ cpu scheduler, and som
addons to this, cfq-ionice and so on.

What scheduler combination do you use?

Re: [Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?]

[Espen Fjellvær Olsen]

Espen Fjellvær Olsen wrote:

> In the recent past, there has been released many new types of both 
> disk and cpu schedulers, i wonder wich of them i should use to get best
> performance on my desktop system?
> Nickshed v30g, or maybe staircase 7.1, or spa, hudra, hybrid and so on,
> those are all quite new IO schedulers.
> Also there has been som new releases of the CFQ cpu scheduler, and som
> addons to this, cfq-ionice and so on.
>
> What scheduler combination do you use?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


It should be the other way round, don't know why i called CFQ an cpu 
scheduler and nickshed a disk scheduler.
Must have had an hard day at work ;)