From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264977AbUFVPnE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:43:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264271AbUFVPjW (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:39:22 -0400 Received: from s1-p135.svorka.net ([194.19.72.135]:17538 "EHLO mandrake.eldiablo.tk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264983AbUFVPf1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:35:27 -0400 Message-ID: <40D851BA.1050305@svorka.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:35:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Espen_Fjellv=E6r_Olsen?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040612) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In the recent past, there has been released many new types of both disk and cpu schedulers, i wonder wich of them i should use to get best performance on my desktop system? Nickshed v30g, or maybe staircase 7.1, or spa, hudra, hybrid and so on, those are all quite new IO schedulers. Also there has been som new releases of the CFQ cpu scheduler, and som addons to this, cfq-ionice and so on. What scheduler combination do you use?