From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265007AbUFVQIm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:08:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265009AbUFVQIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:08:12 -0400 Received: from s1-p135.svorka.net ([194.19.72.135]:13956 "EHLO mandrake.eldiablo.tk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264973AbUFVQFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:05:38 -0400 Message-ID: <40D858D0.6080803@svorka.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:05:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Espen_Fjellv=E6r_Olsen?= Reply-To: Linux Kernel Mailing List User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040612) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Fwd: What Schedulers give best performance?] References: <40D851BA.1050305@svorka.net> In-Reply-To: <40D851BA.1050305@svorka.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Espen Fjellvær Olsen wrote: > In the recent past, there has been released many new types of both > disk and cpu schedulers, i wonder wich of them i should use to get best > performance on my desktop system? > Nickshed v30g, or maybe staircase 7.1, or spa, hudra, hybrid and so on, > those are all quite new IO schedulers. > Also there has been som new releases of the CFQ cpu scheduler, and som > addons to this, cfq-ionice and so on. > > What scheduler combination do you use? > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ It should be the other way round, don't know why i called CFQ an cpu scheduler and nickshed a disk scheduler. Must have had an hard day at work ;)