From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266516AbUFWQjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:39:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266558AbUFWQjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:39:13 -0400 Received: from smtp08.web.de ([217.72.192.226]:55726 "EHLO smtp08.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266516AbUFWQjM (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:39:12 -0400 Message-ID: <40D9B20A.4070409@web.de> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:38:34 +0200 From: Marcus Hartig Organization: Linux of Borgs User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: status of Preemptible Kernel 2.6.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, how is now the status of the preemptible feature of the kernel 2.6.7. Should preempt be used for desktop systems (like in the help menu) or should it not really? I have made tests with the alsa-latency-test, where it not really reduces the latency of the kernel and gives a little bit lower performance of the whole system. Regards, Pl.cc me. Marcus -- www.marcush.de