From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jeremy Katz <jeremy.katz@gmail.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus <torvalds@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
katzj@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC64 iSeries viodasd proc file
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:45:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D9F9F4.8030502@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb5afee10406231415293e90c0@mail.gmail.com>
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> And to be more constructive (after a discussion with Jeff this
> afternoon which is when I realized the reply didn't go out), what
> would be _very_ useful to have from a "probing disks" perspective
> would be a way to enumerate easily and simply from within sysfs the
> disks that are associated with a specific controller. Not entirely
> sure where under sysfs this would go, but to be able to easily see
> that for block device type foo, I have disks disk0, disk1 and disk2.
> The vio sysfs stuff actually works kind of nicely like this, but it
> would be more useful as a generic thing rather than not being able to
> depend on it.
And here's what I said to Jeremy over IRC as well...
I think it's perfectly reasonable to want a "driver -> registered
devices" mapping. That's what the installer appears to want, if I
understand Jeremy correctly.
That will probably take some thought by the sysfs wizards, though, since
drivers are registered on a per-bus basis...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-23 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 6:54 [PATCH] PPC64 iSeries viodasd proc file Stephen Rothwell
2004-06-18 15:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-18 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-20 19:52 ` Jeremy
2004-06-20 21:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-21 6:04 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <cb5afee10406210914451dc6@mail.gmail.com>
2004-06-23 21:15 ` Jeremy Katz
2004-06-23 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-06-23 22:03 ` Greg KH
2004-06-24 0:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-24 20:59 ` Greg KH
2004-06-24 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-23 23:54 Stephen Rothwell
2004-06-23 23:55 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D9F9F4.8030502@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeremy.katz@gmail.com \
--cc=katzj@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox