From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265029AbUGCGJG (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 02:09:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265037AbUGCGJG (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 02:09:06 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:31703 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265029AbUGCGJE (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 02:09:04 -0400 Message-ID: <40E64D71.5020802@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 02:08:49 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jt@hpl.hp.com CC: Linux kernel mailing list , Dan Williams , Pavel Roskin , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update in-kernel orinoco drivers to upstream current CVS References: <20040702222655.GA10333@bougret.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040702222655.GA10333@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > Jeff, does BitKeeper allow to merge patches at an earlier > point than the last version and reconciliate both branches ? That > might come handy. Yes, this is one of BitKeeper's strengths. I can create a BitKeeper repository circa 2.6.0, merge a patch, and then merge that repository into the 2.6.7-BK-latest repository. Jeff